|
News from the American College of Sports Medicine 54th
Annual Meeting
May 30 - June 2, 2007
New Orleans, LA
by Erik Adams MD,
PhD
One person's experience of the ACSM
annual meeting will undoubtedly be different than another's, because
there are so many concurrent sessions from which to choose. An
exception to this rule would be the lecture by Robert Cantu, MD, because
the schedule was arranged so that no other session would conflict with
his. Dr. Cantu has been a leader in the field of concussions,
especially as they relate to sports participation. From a personal
point of view, I found it helpful to hear his perspective, as there are
so many different voices on this topic. Here are some of Dr.
Cantu's points that I found notable:
1. He emphasized that permanent
neurologic sequellae to multiple concussions are seen in a wide variety
of sports, so recent contentions that football is somehow immune to such
an effect do not make sense. He highlighted three recent
high-profile cases in former NFL players, which resulted in early death,
two by suicide. These athletes were afflicted by depression and
cognitive dysfunction.
2. Having said this, there seem
to be substantial inter-individual differences in the cumulative effects
of concussion. Some tolerate 8 or 10 in a career without
difficulty, and some are showing effects much earlier. An
individualized approach is needed for return to play (RTP) issues.
3. He stated that, in his
practice, he does not see a trend towards increasing severity and
duration of post-concussion symptoms, with increasing cumulative number
of concussions, as long as the athlete is allowed to fully recover prior
to RTP. He did also mention that this trend is seen in the
literature, but he did not highlight this apparent dichotomy.
Perhaps he is saying that we are returning athletes prior to complete
symptom resolution?
4. Dr. Cantu stated that second
impact syndrome does exist, but it is rare. This highlights the
need to ensure that symptoms have completely resolved, both without and
with exertion, prior to RTP. I have heard a number of assertions
from other sports medicine physicians that second impact syndrome does
not exist, but here we're hearing it from Dr. Cantu. Consider the
implications of possibly being wrong about the non-existence of second
impact syndrome and sending an athlete back too play too early.
____________________
I also attended a discussion session
on the continuing medical education aspects of the ACSM meeting, where
participants made some important points:
1. One of ACSM's greatest
strengths is its mixture of researchers and clinicians, but many of the
presentations do not attempt to bridge the divide between these two
worlds. One participant stated that a clinician should be able to
state why their topic would be useful or interesting to a researcher,
and vice versa.
2. All of us find the annual
meeting to be a great learning experience and a good opportunity to see
what's new in the field, so that when we get home, we apply these new
ideas to what we are doing every day.
3. There needs to be attention
to maintaining the quality of the presentations, and we need to discuss
whether we need such a large volume of talks.
Lower Extremity Injuries
I had the opportunity to moderate a
session of lower extremity injury research presentations, which ended up
focusing primarily on the ankle. In this field, there appears to
be a new questioning of the current "gold standard" of treatment for
lateral ankle sprains, in which patients are not immobilized and are
returned rapidly to activity. However, some of these researchers
cited an incidence of over 35% for residual subjective instability after
ankle sprain, and one of the presenters showed in an original study that
this is associated with persistent ATF ligament laxity with arthrometer
testing. In the literature, there has been great variability in
duration and type of immobilization in studies of ankle sprains, and in
preparing for the session, I was dismayed to see one paper quote only
one article from 1965 in their admonition to avoid immobilization after
ankle sprain! Certainly, it appears that persistent laxity is a
concern, so I am glad to see this being investigated, with old
assumptions re-investigated.
___________________________________________________________________________
SUMMER ACTIVITIES at Midwest Sports Medicine
|